Scoring the criteria
Sourcing
This article only applies to Sourcing
In Mercell Sourcing, criteria-specific points and maximum points for price and/or quality can be set. In addition, scoring weight values can be set for the acquired items (related to setting price points).
If criterion-specific points are set for the procurement object, the bidder's points can be formed solely on the basis of these. Alternatively, the maximum points for price and quality can also be included in the scoring thinking, in which case these are also taken into account in the scoring of the bidders.
If price points are used, the criterion-specific points are calculated on top of the price points (the ratio to the lowest or a linear calculation is used in the price comparison) and the maximum quality points are assigned to the bidder who has received the largest number of criterion-specific points (the maximum quality points are compared using the formula of the larger ratio).
See also:
Set points for the criteria of the procurement target
Points are set by entering the maximum points of the criterion in the maximum point field and selecting how the points are calculated
The point calculation method to be set depends on the criterion type
Numerical
Ratio to largest (automatic)
(offered value/highest given) x maximum points
Ratio to smallest (automatic)
(minimum given/offered value) x maximum points
Ratio to largest, linear (automatic)
Ratio to the largest, if no minimum value is defined for the criterion: (offered value - smallest given value) / (largest given value - smallest given value) x maximum points
Ratio to the largest, if a minimum value has been defined for the criterion: (offered value - minimum value) / (maximum given value - minimum value) x maximum points
Ratio to minimum, linear (automatic)
Ratio to the smallest, if no maximum value is defined for the criterion: (1- I(offered value - smallest given value)I / I(highest given value - smallest given value)I) x maximum points
Ratio to the smallest, if a maximum value is defined for the criterion: (1- I(offered value - smallest given value)I / I(maximum value - smallest given value)I) x maximum points
FIGURE: Scoring options for the numerical criterion. In the example, you can get 10 points for the tire inch size criterion. The points calculation method menu is open
Tiered scoring
Define the steps for scoring
Define the upper limit of the lowest rung first
Use the arrow to insert more stairs
Check the text below for the stairs
FIGURE: Definition of graded scoring. In the example, work experience is asked using a numerical criterion. With 1-5 years of experience you get 2 points, with >5-10 years of experience you get 5 points and with more than 10 years of work experience you get 10 points
For your information
Manual entry of points
The points are entered into the comparison table
Uploadable
Manual entry of points
The points are entered into the comparison table
Text
Manual entry of points
The points are entered into the comparison table
Menu
Points are set in the definition of menu scoring
Define whether there is a restriction on the selection
"There is no limitation in the choice" - the bidder can leave no answer or select the desired number of options
"Choose at most one" - the bidder can not answer or choose one option
"Choose at least one" - the bidder must choose at least one option, but he can choose more
"Select one" - the bidder must select one option
Define the selections by entering the selection in "New selection line" and the points obtained from it in "Points"
FIGURE: In the menu scoring definition window, the menu options and their scores are defined
Yes/No
Choose which answer gets the maximum score
PICTURE: When the maximum points have been entered in the drop-down menu, the scoring possibilities of the Yes/No criterion.
Record
Manual entry of points
The points are entered into the comparison table
Subheading
Cannot be scored
Common criteria and their scoring
The procurement has not been divided into lots
The points added to the common criteria are added to the total points for a procurement, that is not divided into lots. In the comparison, the points are shown like this:
FIGURE: Comparison table of common criteria in procurement, which is not divided into lots
The procurement is divided into lots
In procurement divided into lots, the points added to the common criteria are listed on top of the points of each sub-area, so the comparison looks like this:
FIGURE: Comparison table of common criteria in procurement, divided into lots